Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO's notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue's claims of bogus share transactions.
ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO's notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue's claims of bogus share transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
