Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT quashed CIT(E)'s revision order under section 263, holding that the Commissioner cannot exercise revisional jurisdiction when identical issues are pending appeal before CIT(A). The tribunal applied the Doctrine of Merger, emphasizing that only one operative order can govern the same subject matter simultaneously. Since the assessment order under section 143(3) was not found erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests, the revisional order was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, reinforcing procedural limitations on revisional powers when appellate proceedings are ongoing.
ITAT quashed CIT(E)'s revision order under section 263, holding that the Commissioner cannot exercise revisional jurisdiction when identical issues are pending appeal before CIT(A). The tribunal applied the Doctrine of Merger, emphasizing that only one operative order can govern the same subject matter simultaneously. Since the assessment order under section 143(3) was not found erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests, the revisional order was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, reinforcing procedural limitations on revisional powers when appellate proceedings are ongoing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
