Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT quashed CIT(E)'s revision order under section 263, holding that the Commissioner cannot exercise revisional jurisdiction when identical issues are pending appeal before CIT(A). The tribunal applied the Doctrine of Merger, emphasizing that only one operative order can govern the same subject matter simultaneously. Since the assessment order under section 143(3) was not found erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests, the revisional order was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, reinforcing procedural limitations on revisional powers when appellate proceedings are ongoing.
ITAT quashed CIT(E)'s revision order under section 263, holding that the Commissioner cannot exercise revisional jurisdiction when identical issues are pending appeal before CIT(A). The tribunal applied the Doctrine of Merger, emphasizing that only one operative order can govern the same subject matter simultaneously. Since the assessment order under section 143(3) was not found erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests, the revisional order was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, reinforcing procedural limitations on revisional powers when appellate proceedings are ongoing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
