Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural irregularities in sanctioning authority under section 151. The tribunal found that the approval for reopening assessment beyond three years was not granted by the competent authority as prescribed under the new regime. The assessment order under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was struck down due to lack of valid jurisdictional sanction. The tribunal determined that the revenue's reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, and the assessment order was consequently quashed, rendering the entire reassessment process invalid. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's attempt to reopen and reassess the tax liability.
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural irregularities in sanctioning authority under section 151. The tribunal found that the approval for reopening assessment beyond three years was not granted by the competent authority as prescribed under the new regime. The assessment order under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was struck down due to lack of valid jurisdictional sanction. The tribunal determined that the revenue's reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, and the assessment order was consequently quashed, rendering the entire reassessment process invalid. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's attempt to reopen and reassess the tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.