Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural irregularities in sanctioning authority under section 151. The tribunal found that the approval for reopening assessment beyond three years was not granted by the competent authority as prescribed under the new regime. The assessment order under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was struck down due to lack of valid jurisdictional sanction. The tribunal determined that the revenue's reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, and the assessment order was consequently quashed, rendering the entire reassessment process invalid. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's attempt to reopen and reassess the tax liability.
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural irregularities in sanctioning authority under section 151. The tribunal found that the approval for reopening assessment beyond three years was not granted by the competent authority as prescribed under the new regime. The assessment order under section 147 read with sections 144 and 144B was struck down due to lack of valid jurisdictional sanction. The tribunal determined that the revenue's reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, and the assessment order was consequently quashed, rendering the entire reassessment process invalid. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's attempt to reopen and reassess the tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.