Revenue neutrality in domestic related-party loans can require deletion of interest transfer pricing adjustments after domestic-transaction verificati...
Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43...
HC adjudicated a challenge to a SCN under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017, primarily contesting non-compliance with Rule 142 of CGST Rules. The petitioners argued that the SCN was issued without jurisdictional validity, as no tax evasion was alleged, and the notice was not electronically uploaded. The court found a prima facie case in the petitioners' favor, noting that the subsequent final order issued on 21.01.2025 was potentially non-est due to procedural irregularities. Applying the legal maxim "sublato fundamento cadit opus", the HC admitted the petitions and stayed the operation of the impugned order pending final adjudication, emphasizing that procedural non-compliance could invalidate subsequent proceedings.
HC adjudicated a challenge to a SCN under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017, primarily contesting non-compliance with Rule 142 of CGST Rules. The petitioners argued that the SCN was issued without jurisdictional validity, as no tax evasion was alleged, and the notice was not electronically uploaded. The court found a prima facie case in the petitioners' favor, noting that the subsequent final order issued on 21.01.2025 was potentially non-est due to procedural irregularities. Applying the legal maxim "sublato fundamento cadit opus", the HC admitted the petitions and stayed the operation of the impugned order pending final adjudication, emphasizing that procedural non-compliance could invalidate subsequent proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
