Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC affirmed the ITAT's ruling that the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the assessee authority. The court determined that the society's activities were not commercial in nature, but rather focused on development planning and housing, which constitute a charitable objective of general public utility. Two concurrent authorities found no evidence of trade, commerce, or business operations. The assessee's predominant purpose remained charitable, with governmental control over its dissolution. The substantial questions of law were resolved in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue's contention that the organization was operating on commercial lines with a profit motive.
The HC affirmed the ITAT's ruling that the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the assessee authority. The court determined that the society's activities were not commercial in nature, but rather focused on development planning and housing, which constitute a charitable objective of general public utility. Two concurrent authorities found no evidence of trade, commerce, or business operations. The assessee's predominant purpose remained charitable, with governmental control over its dissolution. The substantial questions of law were resolved in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue's contention that the organization was operating on commercial lines with a profit motive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.