<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Charitable Society Wins Tax Exemption: Section 2(15) Interpretation Upholds Non-Commercial Purpose and Public Utility Objectives</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87556</link>
    <description>The HC affirmed the ITAT&#039;s ruling that the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the assessee authority. The court determined that the society&#039;s activities were not commercial in nature, but rather focused on development planning and housing, which constitute a charitable objective of general public utility. Two concurrent authorities found no evidence of trade, commerce, or business operations. The assessee&#039;s predominant purpose remained charitable, with governmental control over its dissolution. The substantial questions of law were resolved in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that the organization was operating on commercial lines with a profit motive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Charitable Society Wins Tax Exemption: Section 2(15) Interpretation Upholds Non-Commercial Purpose and Public Utility Objectives</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87556</link>
      <description>The HC affirmed the ITAT&#039;s ruling that the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the assessee authority. The court determined that the society&#039;s activities were not commercial in nature, but rather focused on development planning and housing, which constitute a charitable objective of general public utility. Two concurrent authorities found no evidence of trade, commerce, or business operations. The assessee&#039;s predominant purpose remained charitable, with governmental control over its dissolution. The substantial questions of law were resolved in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that the organization was operating on commercial lines with a profit motive.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>