Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC determined that the petitioner seeks refund of IGST paid on export goods, with a representation submitted on 03.10.2022 pending consideration. The court directs the petitioner to submit a copy of the representation to the 2nd respondent within 2 weeks of receiving the order. The petition is disposed of, mandating administrative review of the refund claim and providing procedural guidance for further action on the IGST refund request.
HC determined that the petitioner seeks refund of IGST paid on export goods, with a representation submitted on 03.10.2022 pending consideration. The court directs the petitioner to submit a copy of the representation to the 2nd respondent within 2 weeks of receiving the order. The petition is disposed of, mandating administrative review of the refund claim and providing procedural guidance for further action on the IGST refund request.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.