Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, following Supreme Court precedent condemning mechanical adjournment requests. The tribunal found no justification for adjourning the matter beyond three statutorily permitted instances. The decision underscores judicial intolerance for repeated, unwarranted procedural delays that obstruct efficient case resolution, emphasizing the need for parties to utilize court-granted opportunities responsibly and expeditiously.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, following Supreme Court precedent condemning mechanical adjournment requests. The tribunal found no justification for adjourning the matter beyond three statutorily permitted instances. The decision underscores judicial intolerance for repeated, unwarranted procedural delays that obstruct efficient case resolution, emphasizing the need for parties to utilize court-granted opportunities responsibly and expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
