Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, following Supreme Court precedent condemning mechanical adjournment requests. The tribunal found no justification for adjourning the matter beyond three statutorily permitted instances. The decision underscores judicial intolerance for repeated, unwarranted procedural delays that obstruct efficient case resolution, emphasizing the need for parties to utilize court-granted opportunities responsibly and expeditiously.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, following Supreme Court precedent condemning mechanical adjournment requests. The tribunal found no justification for adjourning the matter beyond three statutorily permitted instances. The decision underscores judicial intolerance for repeated, unwarranted procedural delays that obstruct efficient case resolution, emphasizing the need for parties to utilize court-granted opportunities responsibly and expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
