Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving manufacturing and service segments. Tribunal found substantial merit in assessee's contentions regarding arm's length pricing methodology. Key objections included improper comparability analysis, incorrect application of transfer pricing principles, and disregard of multiple year data. The Tribunal comprehensively restored all disputed issues to TPO/AO for fresh determination, directing a de novo examination of transfer pricing adjustments. The appellate order allows the assessee to submit additional evidence and mandates the lower authorities to pass a reasoned order consistent with legal principles. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with directions for comprehensive re-examination of transfer pricing computations.
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving manufacturing and service segments. Tribunal found substantial merit in assessee's contentions regarding arm's length pricing methodology. Key objections included improper comparability analysis, incorrect application of transfer pricing principles, and disregard of multiple year data. The Tribunal comprehensively restored all disputed issues to TPO/AO for fresh determination, directing a de novo examination of transfer pricing adjustments. The appellate order allows the assessee to submit additional evidence and mandates the lower authorities to pass a reasoned order consistent with legal principles. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with directions for comprehensive re-examination of transfer pricing computations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.