Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (4) TMI 795 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT remands transfer pricing case for fresh determination after TPO failed transaction-by-transaction approach despite tribunal directions The ITAT Delhi remanded the transfer pricing case back to the TPO/AO for fresh determination. The assessee challenged TP adjustments in manufacturing ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT remands transfer pricing case for fresh determination after TPO failed transaction-by-transaction approach despite tribunal directions

                            The ITAT Delhi remanded the transfer pricing case back to the TPO/AO for fresh determination. The assessee challenged TP adjustments in manufacturing segment, arguing TPO failed to apply transaction-by-transaction approach despite additional evidence and previous tribunal directions. Key objections included improper ALP application, disregard of comparable company selection criteria, exclusion of working capital adjustments, and failure to consider R&D and business support service segments. The tribunal found merit in assessee's contentions regarding errors by lower authorities and directed fresh examination of all issues with speaking orders in accordance with law.




                            1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                            The core legal questions considered in this judgment include:

                            • Whether the transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO in relation to the manufacturing, R&D support services, and business support services segments were justified.
                            • Whether the TPO erred in rejecting the segmentation of the manufacturing segment and in not considering the transaction-by-transaction approach for benchmarking.
                            • Whether the TPO appropriately applied the arm's length principle and considered the correct set of comparables for each segment.
                            • Whether the denial of the working capital adjustment and the application of certain filters by the TPO were justified.
                            • Whether the AO erred in denying the deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
                            • Whether the penalty proceedings initiated under sections 271(1)(c), 271BA, and 271AA were justified.
                            • Whether the computation of interest under section 234D and the withdrawal of interest under section 244A were justified.

                            2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Transfer Pricing Adjustments

                            • Legal Framework and Precedents: The transfer pricing adjustments were made under sections 92C and 92CA of the Income Tax Act, which require international transactions to be at arm's length. The Tribunal referred to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and various judicial precedents to assess the appropriateness of the adjustments.
                            • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal found that the TPO failed to examine the arm's length price (ALP) on a transaction-by-transaction basis and did not consider the additional evidence submitted by the assessee. The TPO also failed to provide a working capital adjustment, despite the DRP's direction to do so.
                            • Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal noted that the TPO did not adequately consider the segmented financials and the different business models of the assessee's manufacturing sub-segments. The TPO also disregarded the comparables proposed by the assessee without providing sufficient reasoning.
                            • Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal applied the arm's length principle and found that the TPO's approach was inconsistent with the legal requirements. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed analysis of each sub-segment and the consideration of relevant comparables.
                            • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal considered the assessee's arguments regarding the functional differences between sub-segments and the need for a working capital adjustment. The Tribunal also acknowledged the assessee's reliance on judicial precedents supporting the inclusion of certain comparables.
                            • Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the transfer pricing adjustments were not justified and directed the TPO/AO to re-examine the issues in light of the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee.

                            Deduction under Section 10A

                            • Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 10A provides a deduction for profits from export-oriented units. The Tribunal referred to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT v. TEI Technologies (P.) Ltd., which held that section 10A is an exemption provision.
                            • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal found that the AO erred in denying the deduction under section 10A, as the assessee had submitted sufficient evidence to support its claim.
                            • Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal noted that the assessee had provided the necessary documentation, including Form 56F, to substantiate its claim for deduction under section 10A.
                            • Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal applied the principles established in the TEI Technologies case and concluded that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 10A.
                            • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal considered the AO's arguments but found them unconvincing in light of the evidence and legal precedents presented by the assessee.
                            • Conclusions: The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction under section 10A as claimed by the assessee.

                            Penalty Proceedings and Interest Computation

                            • Legal Framework and Precedents: Sections 271(1)(c), 271BA, and 271AA relate to penalties for concealment of income and non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation requirements. Sections 234D and 244A pertain to interest computation.
                            • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal found that the initiation of penalty proceedings was mechanical and lacked adequate satisfaction. Similarly, the computation of interest was not supported by satisfactory reasons.
                            • Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal noted the absence of specific findings or reasoning in the AO's order to justify the penalties and interest computation.
                            • Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal applied the principles of natural justice and found that the AO's actions were not in accordance with the law.
                            • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal considered the assessee's arguments regarding the lack of justification for penalties and interest computation.
                            • Conclusions: The Tribunal set aside the penalty proceedings and directed the AO to re-evaluate the interest computation in accordance with the law.

                            3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                            • Preserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: "The Tribunal concluded that the transfer pricing adjustments were not justified and directed the TPO/AO to re-examine the issues in light of the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee."
                            • Core Principles Established: The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a transaction-by-transaction analysis for transfer pricing adjustments and the need to consider relevant comparables and working capital adjustments.
                            • Final Determinations on Each Issue: The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the TPO/AO to re-evaluate the transfer pricing adjustments and allow the deduction under section 10A. The penalty proceedings and interest computation were also set aside for re-evaluation.

                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found