Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable presumptions favor the complainant when cheque execution is admitted or proven. The accused failed to effectively rebut statutory presumptions regarding legally enforceable debt. Revisional jurisdiction permits interference only where lower court orders demonstrate illegality or impropriety. The court found sufficient evidence supporting the complainant's claim, thus partially allowing the revision petition by modifying the sentence while maintaining conviction and compensation order.
HC held that under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable presumptions favor the complainant when cheque execution is admitted or proven. The accused failed to effectively rebut statutory presumptions regarding legally enforceable debt. Revisional jurisdiction permits interference only where lower court orders demonstrate illegality or impropriety. The court found sufficient evidence supporting the complainant's claim, thus partially allowing the revision petition by modifying the sentence while maintaining conviction and compensation order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.