Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
HC held that the Appellate Tribunal's dismissal of the legal representative (LR) petition was improper. The tribunal erroneously applied CPC Order 22 provisions to a PMLA proceeding, violating principles of natural justice. Section 72 of PMLA enables continuation of proceedings upon appellant's death without prescribing a specific time limitation. The court found no legal basis for abating the appeal and emphasized that the tribunal should have taken a liberal approach, allowing the legal heir to be substituted and adjudicating the matter on merits. The impugned order was set aside, with the appeal being allowed, thereby reinstating the legal representative's right to pursue the pending proceedings.
HC held that the Appellate Tribunal's dismissal of the legal representative (LR) petition was improper. The tribunal erroneously applied CPC Order 22 provisions to a PMLA proceeding, violating principles of natural justice. Section 72 of PMLA enables continuation of proceedings upon appellant's death without prescribing a specific time limitation. The court found no legal basis for abating the appeal and emphasized that the tribunal should have taken a liberal approach, allowing the legal heir to be substituted and adjudicating the matter on merits. The impugned order was set aside, with the appeal being allowed, thereby reinstating the legal representative's right to pursue the pending proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.