Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
AAR determined that the advance ruling application by the contractor regarding GST rate reimbursement was inadmissible. The ruling authority found the tax liability assessment question does not align with Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Due to the applicant's failure to respond to official notices and the nature of the query falling outside statutory provisions, no substantive ruling was issued. The application was effectively dismissed without addressing the underlying GST rate dispute between 5% and 12% for the works contract.
AAR determined that the advance ruling application by the contractor regarding GST rate reimbursement was inadmissible. The ruling authority found the tax liability assessment question does not align with Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Due to the applicant's failure to respond to official notices and the nature of the query falling outside statutory provisions, no substantive ruling was issued. The application was effectively dismissed without addressing the underlying GST rate dispute between 5% and 12% for the works contract.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
