Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of AAR determined that the advance ruling application by the contractor regarding GST rate reimbursement was inadmissible. The ruling authority found the tax liability assessment question does not align with Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Due to the applicant's failure to respond to official notices and the nature of the query falling outside statutory provisions, no substantive ruling was issued. The application was effectively dismissed without addressing the underlying GST rate dispute between 5% and 12% for the works contract.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
