Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT held that the addition under Section 69C was unsustainable due to procedural impropriety. The AO's reliance solely on unverified statements, without providing cross-examination opportunities, violated principles of natural justice. The tribunal found no corroborative evidence to substantiate the allegations of cash transactions. The seized materials were deemed insufficient as primary direct evidence. The assessment order was consequently set aside, with the tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue's claims.
ITAT held that the addition under Section 69C was unsustainable due to procedural impropriety. The AO's reliance solely on unverified statements, without providing cross-examination opportunities, violated principles of natural justice. The tribunal found no corroborative evidence to substantiate the allegations of cash transactions. The seized materials were deemed insufficient as primary direct evidence. The assessment order was consequently set aside, with the tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue's claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.