Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the addition under Section 69C was unsustainable due to procedural impropriety. The AO's reliance solely on unverified statements, without providing cross-examination opportunities, violated principles of natural justice. The tribunal found no corroborative evidence to substantiate the allegations of cash transactions. The seized materials were deemed insufficient as primary direct evidence. The assessment order was consequently set aside, with the tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue's claims.
ITAT held that the addition under Section 69C was unsustainable due to procedural impropriety. The AO's reliance solely on unverified statements, without providing cross-examination opportunities, violated principles of natural justice. The tribunal found no corroborative evidence to substantiate the allegations of cash transactions. The seized materials were deemed insufficient as primary direct evidence. The assessment order was consequently set aside, with the tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue's claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.