Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding capital gains tax on land sale, setting aside both the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders. The dispute centered on whether the land qualified as a "capital asset" under s. 2(14), specifically whether it was situated within municipal limits of Sardarsahar. The Tribunal found that revenue authorities failed to properly consider the Rajasthan State Gazette dated 14.07.1988, which established boundary limits under the Rajasthan Nagar Palika Act, 1959. A subsequent letter dated 04.04.2019 clarified that the land was outside municipal limits, contradicting the earlier letter relied upon by the AO. The ITAT held that the tax authorities failed to discharge their evidentiary burden on this crucial jurisdictional fact.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding capital gains tax on land sale, setting aside both the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders. The dispute centered on whether the land qualified as a "capital asset" under s. 2(14), specifically whether it was situated within municipal limits of Sardarsahar. The Tribunal found that revenue authorities failed to properly consider the Rajasthan State Gazette dated 14.07.1988, which established boundary limits under the Rajasthan Nagar Palika Act, 1959. A subsequent letter dated 04.04.2019 clarified that the land was outside municipal limits, contradicting the earlier letter relied upon by the AO. The ITAT held that the tax authorities failed to discharge their evidentiary burden on this crucial jurisdictional fact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.