Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC overturned the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings against a public servant for possessing disproportionate assets. The Court ruled that the High Court improperly exercised inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after discharge applications had already been dismissed. The Court determined that questions regarding the validity of prosecution sanction should be examined during trial rather than in pre-trial proceedings. The SC emphasized that the High Court erroneously revisited earlier decisions without any material change in circumstances and incorrectly assessed evidentiary matters that should be determined at trial. The typographical error in the sanction order was not sufficient grounds for quashing. The appeal was allowed and the case was restored to the Trial Court.
The SC overturned the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings against a public servant for possessing disproportionate assets. The Court ruled that the High Court improperly exercised inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after discharge applications had already been dismissed. The Court determined that questions regarding the validity of prosecution sanction should be examined during trial rather than in pre-trial proceedings. The SC emphasized that the High Court erroneously revisited earlier decisions without any material change in circumstances and incorrectly assessed evidentiary matters that should be determined at trial. The typographical error in the sanction order was not sufficient grounds for quashing. The appeal was allowed and the case was restored to the Trial Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
