Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed a petition challenging detention of goods and vehicle due to an expired E-way bill. The Court found that natural justice principles were satisfied as a show-cause notice was issued and hearing opportunity provided to petitioners after the detention order. Authorities had valid jurisdiction as the vehicle was intercepted at Dharsiva heading toward Bilaspur-the opposite direction from the route specified in the original E-way bill-with a subsequent E-way bill generated for Madhya Pradesh. The Court distinguished this case from precedents where traffic blockages or technical portal issues justified E-way bill violations, finding no grounds to interfere with the detention order.
The HC dismissed a petition challenging detention of goods and vehicle due to an expired E-way bill. The Court found that natural justice principles were satisfied as a show-cause notice was issued and hearing opportunity provided to petitioners after the detention order. Authorities had valid jurisdiction as the vehicle was intercepted at Dharsiva heading toward Bilaspur-the opposite direction from the route specified in the original E-way bill-with a subsequent E-way bill generated for Madhya Pradesh. The Court distinguished this case from precedents where traffic blockages or technical portal issues justified E-way bill violations, finding no grounds to interfere with the detention order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
