<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Expired E-way Bill and Wrong Route Direction Lead to Valid Detention of Goods Under GST Rules</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87017</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a petition challenging detention of goods and vehicle due to an expired E-way bill. The Court found that natural justice principles were satisfied as a show-cause notice was issued and hearing opportunity provided to petitioners after the detention order. Authorities had valid jurisdiction as the vehicle was intercepted at Dharsiva heading toward Bilaspur-the opposite direction from the route specified in the original E-way bill-with a subsequent E-way bill generated for Madhya Pradesh. The Court distinguished this case from precedents where traffic blockages or technical portal issues justified E-way bill violations, finding no grounds to interfere with the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:31:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Expired E-way Bill and Wrong Route Direction Lead to Valid Detention of Goods Under GST Rules</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87017</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a petition challenging detention of goods and vehicle due to an expired E-way bill. The Court found that natural justice principles were satisfied as a show-cause notice was issued and hearing opportunity provided to petitioners after the detention order. Authorities had valid jurisdiction as the vehicle was intercepted at Dharsiva heading toward Bilaspur-the opposite direction from the route specified in the original E-way bill-with a subsequent E-way bill generated for Madhya Pradesh. The Court distinguished this case from precedents where traffic blockages or technical portal issues justified E-way bill violations, finding no grounds to interfere with the detention order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:31:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>