Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CCI found prima facie evidence that TASMAC is abusing its dominant position in Tamil Nadu's beer market by limiting market access to certain brands, contravening Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. Data revealed that Kals Breweries and SNJ Breweries brands commanded significantly higher procurement shares (increasing from 40.22% in 2021-22 to 56.76% in 2023-24) compared to other well-known brands. The Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter under Section 26(1) of the Act and submit a report within 60 days, finding substance in allegations that TASMAC's preferential procurement practices potentially constitute an abuse of its monopolistic position.
CCI found prima facie evidence that TASMAC is abusing its dominant position in Tamil Nadu's beer market by limiting market access to certain brands, contravening Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. Data revealed that Kals Breweries and SNJ Breweries brands commanded significantly higher procurement shares (increasing from 40.22% in 2021-22 to 56.76% in 2023-24) compared to other well-known brands. The Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter under Section 26(1) of the Act and submit a report within 60 days, finding substance in allegations that TASMAC's preferential procurement practices potentially constitute an abuse of its monopolistic position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
