Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CCI found prima facie evidence that TASMAC is abusing its dominant position in Tamil Nadu's beer market by limiting market access to certain brands, contravening Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. Data revealed that Kals Breweries and SNJ Breweries brands commanded significantly higher procurement shares (increasing from 40.22% in 2021-22 to 56.76% in 2023-24) compared to other well-known brands. The Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter under Section 26(1) of the Act and submit a report within 60 days, finding substance in allegations that TASMAC's preferential procurement practices potentially constitute an abuse of its monopolistic position.
CCI found prima facie evidence that TASMAC is abusing its dominant position in Tamil Nadu's beer market by limiting market access to certain brands, contravening Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, 2002. Data revealed that Kals Breweries and SNJ Breweries brands commanded significantly higher procurement shares (increasing from 40.22% in 2021-22 to 56.76% in 2023-24) compared to other well-known brands. The Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter under Section 26(1) of the Act and submit a report within 60 days, finding substance in allegations that TASMAC's preferential procurement practices potentially constitute an abuse of its monopolistic position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.