PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT directed exclusion of three companies (Wipro Limited, Infosys Ltd., and Tata Elexi Limited) as comparables for transfer pricing adjustments, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Agnity India Technologies and Avaya India cases. Regarding interest on outstanding receivables from AEs, the Tribunal remanded the issue to AO/TPO to examine industry practices and any mutual payment agreements. The ITAT held that if receivables are within industry average holding periods or contractual terms, adjustment may not be warranted. The Tribunal found LIBOR plus 425 basis points excessive for computing interest, suggesting that a rate based solely on LIBOR would be more appropriate. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT directed exclusion of three companies (Wipro Limited, Infosys Ltd., and Tata Elexi Limited) as comparables for transfer pricing adjustments, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Agnity India Technologies and Avaya India cases. Regarding interest on outstanding receivables from AEs, the Tribunal remanded the issue to AO/TPO to examine industry practices and any mutual payment agreements. The ITAT held that if receivables are within industry average holding periods or contractual terms, adjustment may not be warranted. The Tribunal found LIBOR plus 425 basis points excessive for computing interest, suggesting that a rate based solely on LIBOR would be more appropriate. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.