Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the appellant's claim for TDS credit that was denied because it appeared in the trust's Form 26AS rather than the appellant's, despite the appellant being the trust's sole beneficiary. The tribunal noted that an inequitable situation had arisen where the Department neither granted credit to the trust nor the appellant, while still raising a demand against the appellant. The ITAT directed the AO to transfer the TDS credit from the trust's Form 26AS to the appellant's and allow the credit in accordance with law, acknowledging that while procedural compliance is important, the substantive right to tax credit cannot be denied when tax has been legitimately deducted and remitted to the government.
The ITAT allowed the appellant's claim for TDS credit that was denied because it appeared in the trust's Form 26AS rather than the appellant's, despite the appellant being the trust's sole beneficiary. The tribunal noted that an inequitable situation had arisen where the Department neither granted credit to the trust nor the appellant, while still raising a demand against the appellant. The ITAT directed the AO to transfer the TDS credit from the trust's Form 26AS to the appellant's and allow the credit in accordance with law, acknowledging that while procedural compliance is important, the substantive right to tax credit cannot be denied when tax has been legitimately deducted and remitted to the government.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.