Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside the Pr. CIT's revisional order under s.263, restoring the AO's reassessment order under s.147 r.w.s.144B. The Tribunal determined that the AO had arrived at a possible and plausible view regarding the taxpayer's eligibility for s.54B deduction after proper verification of agricultural use of the land. The Pr. CIT improperly substituted his own interpretation of ISRO satellite imagery and CCOST reports when the AO had already considered these alongside land revenue records, physical verification reports, and witness statements. The Tribunal held that revenue records evidencing agricultural use should be given precedence over satellite imagery, following Supreme Court precedent.
ITAT set aside the Pr. CIT's revisional order under s.263, restoring the AO's reassessment order under s.147 r.w.s.144B. The Tribunal determined that the AO had arrived at a possible and plausible view regarding the taxpayer's eligibility for s.54B deduction after proper verification of agricultural use of the land. The Pr. CIT improperly substituted his own interpretation of ISRO satellite imagery and CCOST reports when the AO had already considered these alongside land revenue records, physical verification reports, and witness statements. The Tribunal held that revenue records evidencing agricultural use should be given precedence over satellite imagery, following Supreme Court precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.