The HC quashed the order blocking petitioner's Electronic Credit...

The HC quashed the order blocking petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of CGST/SGST Rules. The court found that the impugned order lacked independent reasoning, instead relying on enforcement authority reports which constituted "borrowed satisfaction." Additionally, no pre-decisional hearing was granted to the petitioner before blocking the ECL, violating principles of natural justice. The order merely stated the registered person was "found to be a bill trader and involved in issuance/availment in fake invoices" without providing substantive reasoning. The court determined these procedural and substantive defects rendered the blocking order legally untenable and allowed the petition.