<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A quashed due to lack of reasoning and natural justice violation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86886</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the order blocking petitioner&#039;s Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of CGST/SGST Rules. The court found that the impugned order lacked independent reasoning, instead relying on enforcement authority reports which constituted &quot;borrowed satisfaction.&quot; Additionally, no pre-decisional hearing was granted to the petitioner before blocking the ECL, violating principles of natural justice. The order merely stated the registered person was &quot;found to be a bill trader and involved in issuance/availment in fake invoices&quot; without providing substantive reasoning. The court determined these procedural and substantive defects rendered the blocking order legally untenable and allowed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A quashed due to lack of reasoning and natural justice violation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86886</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the order blocking petitioner&#039;s Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of CGST/SGST Rules. The court found that the impugned order lacked independent reasoning, instead relying on enforcement authority reports which constituted &quot;borrowed satisfaction.&quot; Additionally, no pre-decisional hearing was granted to the petitioner before blocking the ECL, violating principles of natural justice. The order merely stated the registered person was &quot;found to be a bill trader and involved in issuance/availment in fake invoices&quot; without providing substantive reasoning. The court determined these procedural and substantive defects rendered the blocking order legally untenable and allowed the petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>