Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that payments made by the assessee to Deloitte Global Services Pvt. Ltd. for Global brand, Global Communications, and Global technology/Knowledge Management services do not constitute royalty under Article 13(3) of the India-UK DTAA. Following precedent established in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, the Tribunal determined that these payments fall outside the scope and definition of 'royalty' under Article 13(1) of the DTAA. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195 while making these payments to DGSHL.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that payments made by the assessee to Deloitte Global Services Pvt. Ltd. for Global brand, Global Communications, and Global technology/Knowledge Management services do not constitute royalty under Article 13(3) of the India-UK DTAA. Following precedent established in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, the Tribunal determined that these payments fall outside the scope and definition of 'royalty' under Article 13(1) of the DTAA. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195 while making these payments to DGSHL.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.