Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that payments made by the assessee to Deloitte Global Services Pvt. Ltd. for Global brand, Global Communications, and Global technology/Knowledge Management services do not constitute royalty under Article 13(3) of the India-UK DTAA. Following precedent established in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, the Tribunal determined that these payments fall outside the scope and definition of 'royalty' under Article 13(1) of the DTAA. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195 while making these payments to DGSHL.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that payments made by the assessee to Deloitte Global Services Pvt. Ltd. for Global brand, Global Communications, and Global technology/Knowledge Management services do not constitute royalty under Article 13(3) of the India-UK DTAA. Following precedent established in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, the Tribunal determined that these payments fall outside the scope and definition of 'royalty' under Article 13(1) of the DTAA. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source under section 195 while making these payments to DGSHL.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
