Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts.
The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.