https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86802 The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:17 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86802 The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts. Highlights FEMA Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:17 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86802