Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts.
The AT held that appellants could not escape liability for failing to realize and repatriate export proceeds totaling USD 3,93,094.63 related to seven GRs. Despite their resignation from M/s Rosecut Diamonds effective 01.09.2000, the statutory period for repatriation had expired between 02.05.2000 and 13.08.2000, prior to their departure. The tribunal rejected appellants' claims of making reasonable efforts to contact buyers, noting lack of corroborating evidence of effective steps taken to recover foreign exchange dues. The AT found appellants had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of FEMA 1999 read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of FEMA Regulations 2000. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 10,00,000 each, with pre-deposits of Rs. 5,00,000 to be adjusted against the reduced amounts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
