Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
The HC held that the requirement to file a certified copy of an appealed order under GST Rules is procedural rather than mandatory. The petitioner had filed their appeal on 15.11.2022 with a copy of the order, before Rule 108 was amended on 16.12.2022. Following the Delhi HC decision in Chegg India Private Limited, the Court determined that when an appeal is filed with all necessary documents including a copy of the appealed order, a certified copy is not required. The Court ruled that the amendment to Rule 108 applies retrospectively as it is procedural in nature. The petition was allowed and the matter remanded to the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) for consideration on merits.
The HC held that the requirement to file a certified copy of an appealed order under GST Rules is procedural rather than mandatory. The petitioner had filed their appeal on 15.11.2022 with a copy of the order, before Rule 108 was amended on 16.12.2022. Following the Delhi HC decision in Chegg India Private Limited, the Court determined that when an appeal is filed with all necessary documents including a copy of the appealed order, a certified copy is not required. The Court ruled that the amendment to Rule 108 applies retrospectively as it is procedural in nature. The petition was allowed and the matter remanded to the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.