Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for condonation of delay in filing a corrected return. The petitioner had erroneously clubbed disallowances under s37 in column-23 instead of properly recording them in columns 15 and 18 of Form ITR-6. Since this was merely a presentation error with no impact on taxable income, and was made to facilitate CPC processing for potential refund, the Court held that the tax authority should have condoned the delay. The HC directed respondent to process the revised return filed on 06/09/2019 in accordance with law, emphasizing that the correction was a formality that did not alter the substantive tax position.
The HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for condonation of delay in filing a corrected return. The petitioner had erroneously clubbed disallowances under s37 in column-23 instead of properly recording them in columns 15 and 18 of Form ITR-6. Since this was merely a presentation error with no impact on taxable income, and was made to facilitate CPC processing for potential refund, the Court held that the tax authority should have condoned the delay. The HC directed respondent to process the revised return filed on 06/09/2019 in accordance with law, emphasizing that the correction was a formality that did not alter the substantive tax position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
