Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for condonation of delay in filing a corrected return. The petitioner had erroneously clubbed disallowances under s37 in column-23 instead of properly recording them in columns 15 and 18 of Form ITR-6. Since this was merely a presentation error with no impact on taxable income, and was made to facilitate CPC processing for potential refund, the Court held that the tax authority should have condoned the delay. The HC directed respondent to process the revised return filed on 06/09/2019 in accordance with law, emphasizing that the correction was a formality that did not alter the substantive tax position.
The HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for condonation of delay in filing a corrected return. The petitioner had erroneously clubbed disallowances under s37 in column-23 instead of properly recording them in columns 15 and 18 of Form ITR-6. Since this was merely a presentation error with no impact on taxable income, and was made to facilitate CPC processing for potential refund, the Court held that the tax authority should have condoned the delay. The HC directed respondent to process the revised return filed on 06/09/2019 in accordance with law, emphasizing that the correction was a formality that did not alter the substantive tax position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
