Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT ruled against exemption under S.No. 12(a) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services provided to RDA and NRDA, finding both authorities were engaged in commercial activities with plots and townships sold at commercial rates. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter regarding S.No. 12(e) exemption for reservoirs, sumps, and pumping stations, clarifying that "plant" would include pumping stations and interconnected reservoirs/sumps. CESTAT also directed reexamination of NRDA services eligibility under S.No. 12(e). The Tribunal set aside the extended period of limitation and associated penalties, finding no deliberate misstatement or suppression. Appeals allowed by way of remand to the Original Sanctioning Authority.
CESTAT ruled against exemption under S.No. 12(a) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services provided to RDA and NRDA, finding both authorities were engaged in commercial activities with plots and townships sold at commercial rates. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter regarding S.No. 12(e) exemption for reservoirs, sumps, and pumping stations, clarifying that "plant" would include pumping stations and interconnected reservoirs/sumps. CESTAT also directed reexamination of NRDA services eligibility under S.No. 12(e). The Tribunal set aside the extended period of limitation and associated penalties, finding no deliberate misstatement or suppression. Appeals allowed by way of remand to the Original Sanctioning Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.