Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC granted the landlord's application under Section 446 of the Companies Act, directing the official liquidator to surrender premises leased to a company in liquidation. The Court determined it had jurisdiction to entertain such claims against companies in liquidation, rejecting the liquidator's argument that the landlord should pursue separate eviction proceedings. The Court found the liquidator's claim that the premises were needed for storing company records was disingenuous, as an Official Liquidator's Report had confirmed no books or records were present. The ex-directors' perfunctory applications for company revival were dismissed, with the Court concluding that continued rental payments were unjustified given the premises' disuse.
The HC granted the landlord's application under Section 446 of the Companies Act, directing the official liquidator to surrender premises leased to a company in liquidation. The Court determined it had jurisdiction to entertain such claims against companies in liquidation, rejecting the liquidator's argument that the landlord should pursue separate eviction proceedings. The Court found the liquidator's claim that the premises were needed for storing company records was disingenuous, as an Official Liquidator's Report had confirmed no books or records were present. The ex-directors' perfunctory applications for company revival were dismissed, with the Court concluding that continued rental payments were unjustified given the premises' disuse.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.