Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal concerning classification of imported Squid Liver Powder, upholding its classification under CTH 2309 9090 rather than CTH 2301 2011. The Tribunal rejected appellant's request to keep proceedings pending, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Union Territory of Ladakh that courts must decide matters based on existing law. Following precedent established in Avanti Feeds Limited, CESTAT confirmed the product's classification under CTH 2309 9090. The Tribunal determined that Rule 3(b) regarding essential character was unnecessary as classification under CTH 2309 was clearly established by Customs Tariff and HSN. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal concerning classification of imported Squid Liver Powder, upholding its classification under CTH 2309 9090 rather than CTH 2301 2011. The Tribunal rejected appellant's request to keep proceedings pending, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Union Territory of Ladakh that courts must decide matters based on existing law. Following precedent established in Avanti Feeds Limited, CESTAT confirmed the product's classification under CTH 2309 9090. The Tribunal determined that Rule 3(b) regarding essential character was unnecessary as classification under CTH 2309 was clearly established by Customs Tariff and HSN. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.