Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Squid Liver Powder classified under CTH 2309 90 90 not CTH 2301 20 11 under Customs Tariff Act</h1> <h3>M/s. Avanti Feeds Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import) Custom House, Chennai</h3> M/s. Avanti Feeds Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import) Custom House, Chennai - TMI 1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe Tribunal considered the following core legal questions:(A) Whether the hearing and decision in the present appeal should be kept pending until the resolution of a related case before the High Court of Madras.(B) Whether the imported product, Squid Liver Powder, should be classified under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2301 20 11 as claimed by the appellant.(C) Whether the imported product falls under CTH 2309 90 90 as determined by the Revenue.(D) Whether the classification of the goods should be determined by the essential character of the mixture under Rule 3(b) of the General Rules of Interpretation of the Tariff (GRI).2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS(A) Request to keep the hearing and decision pendingThe Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH & ORS. Vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR NATIONAL CONFERENCE & ANR, which established that courts should decide matters based on the current law and not await outcomes from other pending cases unless specifically directed by the Apex Court. Thus, the Tribunal proceeded with the case, finding it advantageous for the appellant to address the additional point of law raised.(B) Classification under CTH 2301 20 11The appellant argued that Squid Liver Powder should be classified under CTH 2301 20 11, which covers flours, meals, and pellets of fish or crustaceans, molluscs, or other aquatic invertebrates. The Tribunal examined the Customs Tariff and noted that CTH 2301 20 11 does not cover products containing plant-origin ingredients. Since Squid Liver Powder contains both animal and plant-origin ingredients, it does not fall under this heading.(C) Classification under CTH 2309 90 90The Tribunal considered whether Squid Liver Powder should be classified under CTH 2309 90 90, which includes preparations used in animal feeding. The Tribunal noted that CTH 2309 covers products used in animal feeding, including feed ingredients that are not end products themselves. Squid Liver Powder, being a preparation used for aqua feed and animal diets, fits this classification. The Tribunal also referenced the Harmonized System Nomenclature (HSN) to support this interpretation.(D) Application of Rule 3(b) of GRIThe appellant contended that the classification should be based on the essential character of the mixture under Rule 3(b) of GRI. The Tribunal found that Rule 3(b) applies only if classification under Rule 1 and 2 is ambiguous, which was not the case here. The classification under CTH 2309 was clear based on the Customs Tariff and HSN, making the application of Rule 3(b) unnecessary.3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGSThe Tribunal upheld the classification of Squid Liver Powder under CTH 2309 90 90, aligning with previous decisions and the HSN. The Tribunal emphasized that products used in animal feeding, including feed ingredients, fall under this heading. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the application of Rule 3(b) and the need to wait for the High Court's decision, citing legal precedents that support proceeding with the current law.The Tribunal also addressed the appellant's reliance on previous classification practices and test reports, stating that wrong classifications cannot be perpetuated, and test reports not provided at the Show Cause Notice stage cannot be relied upon. The Tribunal found that the Revenue had effectively demonstrated the correct classification under CTH 2309.Ultimately, the Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the classification under CTH 2309 90 90, and upheld the orders of the lower authorities.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found