Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal concerning classification of imported Squid Liver Powder, upholding its classification under CTH 2309 9090 rather than CTH 2301 2011. The Tribunal rejected appellant's request to keep proceedings pending, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Union Territory of Ladakh that courts must decide matters based on existing law. Following precedent established in Avanti Feeds Limited, CESTAT confirmed the product's classification under CTH 2309 9090. The Tribunal determined that Rule 3(b) regarding essential character was unnecessary as classification under CTH 2309 was clearly established by Customs Tariff and HSN. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal concerning classification of imported Squid Liver Powder, upholding its classification under CTH 2309 9090 rather than CTH 2301 2011. The Tribunal rejected appellant's request to keep proceedings pending, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Union Territory of Ladakh that courts must decide matters based on existing law. Following precedent established in Avanti Feeds Limited, CESTAT confirmed the product's classification under CTH 2309 9090. The Tribunal determined that Rule 3(b) regarding essential character was unnecessary as classification under CTH 2309 was clearly established by Customs Tariff and HSN. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.