Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act against partners of a firm, the HC held that compounding of the offense by one partner discharges the entire liability of the partnership firm and all partners. The court emphasized that while a firm is not a legal entity separate from its partners, Section 141 of the N.I. Act allows prosecution in the firm's name. Partners' liability is joint and several, meaning each partner is liable for the entire debt individually and collectively. The court rejected partial settlement with one partner, ruling that once a matter is compromised for any amount, the offense is compounded toward all existing liabilities of the firm. Consequently, the complaint was quashed as compounded and the petitioner was acquitted.
In a case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act against partners of a firm, the HC held that compounding of the offense by one partner discharges the entire liability of the partnership firm and all partners. The court emphasized that while a firm is not a legal entity separate from its partners, Section 141 of the N.I. Act allows prosecution in the firm's name. Partners' liability is joint and several, meaning each partner is liable for the entire debt individually and collectively. The court rejected partial settlement with one partner, ruling that once a matter is compromised for any amount, the offense is compounded toward all existing liabilities of the firm. Consequently, the complaint was quashed as compounded and the petitioner was acquitted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
