Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal concerning comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded Tata Elxsi Limited (significant intangibles owner), Persistent Systems Limited (diversified activities), Infosys Limited (brand value, R&D expenditure), Mindtree Limited (excessive onsite revenue), and Akshay Software Technologies Limited (ERP implementation services) as non-comparable to the assessee's captive software development services. However, the ITAT retained Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited as valid comparables, rejecting the assessee's functional dissimilarity arguments. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Harbinger Systems Pvt. Limited, finding them functionally similar despite R&D expenditure or database availability concerns.
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal concerning comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded Tata Elxsi Limited (significant intangibles owner), Persistent Systems Limited (diversified activities), Infosys Limited (brand value, R&D expenditure), Mindtree Limited (excessive onsite revenue), and Akshay Software Technologies Limited (ERP implementation services) as non-comparable to the assessee's captive software development services. However, the ITAT retained Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited as valid comparables, rejecting the assessee's functional dissimilarity arguments. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Harbinger Systems Pvt. Limited, finding them functionally similar despite R&D expenditure or database availability concerns.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
