Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal held that the plan could not be reopened for claims belatedly agitated by appellants who failed to pursue their claims within IBC timelines without justifiable reasons. The NCLAT emphasized that admitting claims after plan approval would jeopardize the CIRP implementation process. Finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to admit the belated claims and no infirmities in the impugned order, the NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's decision and dismissed the appeal.
The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal held that the plan could not be reopened for claims belatedly agitated by appellants who failed to pursue their claims within IBC timelines without justifiable reasons. The NCLAT emphasized that admitting claims after plan approval would jeopardize the CIRP implementation process. Finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to admit the belated claims and no infirmities in the impugned order, the NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's decision and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.