Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether claims filed by homebuyers after inordinate delay and after approval of the resolution plan could be directed to be entertained, and whether rejection of such belated claims warranted interference.
Analysis: The claims were filed more than two years after approval of the resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority and long after the last date fixed for submission of claims. The record showed that the resolution plan itself provided only limited windows for entertaining delayed claims, and the appellants approached the process far beyond those limits. The Information Memorandum could not be faulted for not reflecting claims that were not lodged within time. Once a resolution plan is approved, claims not forming part of the plan stand frozen and claims outside the plan are extinguished, and the process cannot be reopened to accommodate stale demands. The cited precedent on inclusion of omitted homebuyer claims was held distinguishable on facts because the delay there was much shorter and the plan had not yet been approved when the claim was pursued.
Conclusion: The belated claims were not entitled to be admitted, and the order refusing to entertain them was upheld in favour of the respondent.