Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal held that the plan could not be reopened for claims belatedly agitated by appellants who failed to pursue their claims within IBC timelines without justifiable reasons. The NCLAT emphasized that admitting claims after plan approval would jeopardize the CIRP implementation process. Finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to admit the belated claims and no infirmities in the impugned order, the NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's decision and dismissed the appeal.
The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal held that the plan could not be reopened for claims belatedly agitated by appellants who failed to pursue their claims within IBC timelines without justifiable reasons. The NCLAT emphasized that admitting claims after plan approval would jeopardize the CIRP implementation process. Finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to admit the belated claims and no infirmities in the impugned order, the NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's decision and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
