Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held revisionary powers under s.263 cannot be invoked as assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. During survey, assessee surrendered undisclosed income which was included in tax returns. AO conducted specific inquiry regarding applicability of s.115BBE through show cause notice. PCIT cannot merely substitute their view that income should be treated as unexplained investment under s.69 (Rs.66,50,000) and unexplained money under s.69A (Rs.9,50,000). Amendment via Explanation 2(a) expanding revisionary powers does not grant unlimited authority. No errors of law or fact were found in AO's order, which represented a plausible interpretation after proper inquiry. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
ITAT held revisionary powers under s.263 cannot be invoked as assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. During survey, assessee surrendered undisclosed income which was included in tax returns. AO conducted specific inquiry regarding applicability of s.115BBE through show cause notice. PCIT cannot merely substitute their view that income should be treated as unexplained investment under s.69 (Rs.66,50,000) and unexplained money under s.69A (Rs.9,50,000). Amendment via Explanation 2(a) expanding revisionary powers does not grant unlimited authority. No errors of law or fact were found in AO's order, which represented a plausible interpretation after proper inquiry. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.