Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held revisionary powers under s.263 cannot be invoked as assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. During survey, assessee surrendered undisclosed income which was included in tax returns. AO conducted specific inquiry regarding applicability of s.115BBE through show cause notice. PCIT cannot merely substitute their view that income should be treated as unexplained investment under s.69 (Rs.66,50,000) and unexplained money under s.69A (Rs.9,50,000). Amendment via Explanation 2(a) expanding revisionary powers does not grant unlimited authority. No errors of law or fact were found in AO's order, which represented a plausible interpretation after proper inquiry. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
ITAT held revisionary powers under s.263 cannot be invoked as assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. During survey, assessee surrendered undisclosed income which was included in tax returns. AO conducted specific inquiry regarding applicability of s.115BBE through show cause notice. PCIT cannot merely substitute their view that income should be treated as unexplained investment under s.69 (Rs.66,50,000) and unexplained money under s.69A (Rs.9,50,000). Amendment via Explanation 2(a) expanding revisionary powers does not grant unlimited authority. No errors of law or fact were found in AO's order, which represented a plausible interpretation after proper inquiry. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
